Ahmadiyya Times

Telling the truth should be news – If it happened, it will be here…

Free to pursue jihad: Banned JuD chief Saeed appreciates Pakistan’s unique freedoms

“Our rulers are trying to avert this war instead of taking counter measures against their conspiracies. They should not play with national solidarity and sovereignty. They should play a brave part in the defence of Islam and Pakistan.”

Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch | Int’l Desk
Source/Credit: The Express Tribune
By Rana Tanveer | January 1, 2012

LAHORE: Pakistan is unmatched in terms of the freedom it allows for the pursuit of jihad and for the spread of Islam, said Jamaatud Dawa chief Hafiz Saeed on Sunday.

In a statement released in English, Saeed said that he did not believe in modern nationalism, but no other “territory” in the world matched Pakistan and it was a great blessing from Allah.

He said Pakistan’s defence “lies in the Kalima Tayyaba”. He said non-Muslims were conspiring against Pakistan both internally and externally. They could only be defeated by “acting upon the methodology of the state of Medina”.

“Islam is not only a set of a few prayers and teachings. Islam is a complete code of life. The Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) has also taught us a strategy for the defence of countries, as he has taught us prayer, fasting and zakat … the state of Medina had to face the treason and conspiracies of the non-believers of Mecca.”

“The Holy Prophet (pbuh) of Allah Almighty had to fight multi-dimensional and multi-faceted wars with non-believers,” he said. He said Pakistan faced the same geo-political circumstances.

He said Pakistan’s rulers valued their relationship with Europe and America too much. He said US allies India and Israel feared Pakistan because “they know very well” that when Muslims are ready to sacrifice themselves for their cause, no power in the world could stand in their way.

He said that the US, India and Israel had “evil and sinister” designs all over the world. “But all those traps and nets are breaking down as a result of the sacrifices of Muslims,” he said.

Saeed said there was a growing hostility between non-Muslims and Muslims. He said Islam would emerge as a great power in the coming days.

He said Pakistan was being targeted by conspirators because it had been established in the name of Islam. He said the memo scandal, drone attacks, the Abbottabad operation, bomb blasts and the attack on the Salala check posts were part of “the so-called war being fought in this region for the last decade”.

“Our rulers are trying to avert this war instead of taking counter measures against their conspiracies. They should not play with national solidarity and sovereignty. They should play a brave part in the defence of Islam and Pakistan,” he said.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 2nd,  2012.

Read original post here: Free to pursue jihad: Saeed appreciates Pakistan’s unique freedoms

Filed under: Uncategorized

Pakistan: Banned outfits make Punjab home

…[L]ast year several banned organisations, like Sipah-i-Sahaba and Jamatud Dawa, were allowed to continue their activities. He said although these organisations were limited to the Punjab they could surprise and harm to the security establishment, which currently is patronising them.

Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch | Int’l Desk
Source/Credit: The Express Tribune
By Rana Tanveer | December 30, 2011

LAHORE: The city witnessed two explosions in 2011 which left 13 people dead and 112 injured. More than 250 were killed in 18 terrorist activities in 2010.

In the first incident, on January 25, at Ghora Chowk, Urdu Bazar, a suicide bomber killed 10 people and injured 85. The second incident, on February 3, a bombing, killed three people and injured 27 near Haider Sayeen shrine.

Shahbaz Taseer, son of late Punjab governor Salmaan Taseer and US citizen Warren Weinstein were kidnapped for ransom during the year.

Shahbaz was abducted from Gulberg on August 27, while Weinstein was picked up from his Model Town residence.

Security officials have claimed that Al Qaeda operatives are behind both abductions.

The police have still no clue to the whereabouts of Amir Aftab Malik, son-in-law of Gen (retd) Tariq Majeed, who was kidnapped at gunpoint on August 25, 2010.

Some defence analysts hold the view that the operations in Tribal Areas have effected the network of Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) which had resulted in a lull in incidents of terrorism. They say there is no evidence to conclude that the terrorists have changed their policy permanently.

Prof Hasan Askari Rizvi said overall incidents of terrorism had decreased but noted that some high profile attacks had occurred. He said the reduction was due to the operations being conducted in Tribal Areas. Rizvi added that TTP apparently lacked training facilities as many suicide attackers had been arrested last year. He said recruitment of suicide bombers had likely been denied by the operations in Tribal Areas.

Rizvi said Aiman al Zawahri had claimed to be behind the kidnapping of Weinstein. He said it was evident that Al Qaeda and TTP were involved in these high profile kidnappings.

Rizvi noted that last year several banned organisations, like Sipah-i-Sahaba and Jamatud Dawa, were allowed to continue their activities. He said although these organisations were limited to the Punjab they could surprise and harm to the security establishment, which currently is patronising them.

He said because the Punjab was relatively more conservative and had more of an ‘anti-India’ element than other provinces, these banned organisations had settled here. He said intelligence agencies were using these organisations to put pressure on the US and the Pakistani government against drone attacks and granting Most Favoured Nation (MFN) status to India. He said these organisations were also opposed to the military for its role in the war on terror.

A Counter Terrorism Department police officer, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told The Express Tribune that terrorists had suspended operations in the settled areas. He said it was evident from intelligence reports that many TTP leaders and operatives were alive and in regular contact. He said even Lahore was not free of TTP operatives.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 30th, 2011.

Read original post here:

Filed under: Uncategorized

Belgium: Ahmadiyya Muslim Youth start New Year with prayers and community action

After Tahajud they set out to lend a hand to their local communities by volunteering to help clean up the city centers that were the scene of New Year festivities the night before. On this new year’s day 250 youth took part in this action across Belgium.

Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch |
Source/Credit: Khuddam Belgium
By MKA Belgium | January 1, 2011

Ahmadiyya Muslim Youth in Belgium start New Year with prayers and community action following the true teachings of Islam.

Across 14 locations throughout Belgium, more than 250 Muslim Youth welcomed the new year by (Tahajjud) prayers in the early hours of dawn.

After the prayers they set out to lend a hand to their local communities by volunteering to help clean up the city centers that were the scene of New Year festivities the night before. On this new year’s day 250 youth took part in this action across Belgium.

Towns where action took place include Dilbeek, Eupen, Hasselt, Genk, Herk-de-Stad, Beringen, Sint Truiden, Nieuwerkerken, Lier, Antwerpen, Merksem, Turnhout, Kasterlee, and Hoogstraten.

Read original post here: Belgium: Ahmadiyya Muslim Youth start New Year with prayers and community action

Filed under: Uncategorized

Muslim Americans spread the message of peace in New York’s Times Square on New Years Eve

Muslim Americans Celebrate New Years in Times Square - Muslim Americans spread the message of peace in New York’s Times Square on New Years Eve.

Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch |
Source/Credit: CNN iReport
By Ahmad Chaudhry | January 1, 2011

Muslim Americans Celebrate New Years in Times Square

Read original post here: Muslim Americans spread the message of peace in New York’s Times Square on New Years Eve.

Filed under: Uncategorized

The closing of the Pakistani mind

The only community that flourished were the terrorists that the politicians wanted to embrace and the military didn’t want to take on because of its seeming obsession with the endgame in Afghanistan. The nation’s dumbing down became almost an epidemic, propagated in large part by the anchors of the TV channels.

Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch | Int’l Desk
Source/Credit: The Express Tribune
By ET Editorial | December 31, 2011

A collection of the top Pakistan news that featured in 2011

The year 2011 must rank as one of the worst years in the nation’s life. It began with the killing of Punjab Governor Salmaan Taseer and ended with the most internecine of politics to topple the incumbent government before its term in office via the memogate affair. This happened in the midst of an ominous national consensus which seems to have rallied behind the military against the United States, while all economic indicators presaged doom for 2012.

Rage and excessive passion characterised the functioning of many key institutions, with the masses following their lead thanks to the dubious role played by a vastly expanding but increasingly cash-strapped media. Foreign affairs were most immoderately handled, with the army calling the shots and a divided community of politicians pushing each other to the point of no return. The Raymond Davis case was handled in a curiously unbalanced manner without regard to consequences, pledging qisas (hanging) but falling back on diyat (blood money).

The year saw a new peak of the steadily gestated extremism in our collective national behaviour with the blasphemy law netting more innocent victims from among the minority communities. Moreover, the lawyers’ community, which everyone thought was tempered by the finer points of law, exposed itself as an extremist fragment that actually encouraged criminal behaviour.

What was most condemnable is that the nation bent to the command of the extremist because of fear while pretending to be pious and full of ghairat. The right-wing opposition embraced the violent worldview of the terrorists, thinking it went down well with the masses. The liberal was on the run, hiding his stripes lest he be the victim of the excessive passion of the conservative. The war against terrorism was decidedly not the war that Pakistan wanted to fight. Led by the army, the political lemmings decided to walk to the edge by calling the terrorists ‘our own brothers’.

The result was that when Osama bin Laden was killed in Abbottabad, the nation minded the fact that he was killed — some state-backed non-state actors actually observed namaz-i-janaza for him — forgetting that he and his many local affiliates had killed innocent Pakistanis. You have to be a non-Pakistani to understand what was happening in June when the nation ‘united’ and the politicians got together in an APC, led by the nose into what appeared to be Pakistan’s most isolationist phase. Pakistan’s relations with Isaf-Nato states plummeted and October saw what appears to be the endgame, not in Afghanistan, but Pakistan.

When the state was expressing its willingness to fight the world and not the terrorists, and the people were forming a suicidal consensus, nothing was going right with the economy. The infrastructure wound down quickly, the railways gave up its ghost, the PIA started grounding its planes because of lack of funds, and the industrial sector was halted by the shortage of energy pushed by dwindling reserves of natural gas that Pakistan had been guzzling with no planning or the future. People living without electricity attacked public property to make the government heed their grievances.

The only community that flourished were the terrorists that the politicians wanted to embrace and the military didn’t want to take on because of its seeming obsession with the endgame in Afghanistan. The nation’s dumbing down became almost an epidemic, propagated in large part by the anchors of the TV channels. That said, a generally vibrant media was a welcome check and we can hope for relatively more mature comment in future. The increasing use of social media among many urban educated Pakistan is an added positive as well, since it is, to some extent, shaping public discourse. Furthermore, it has led to a more freeing of the rigid control of information exercised by the state. The year ended with mammoth political rallies organised after their leaders pushed the right buttons — hate America, love the Taliban — reinforcing the state’s isolationist trajectory. Yet with a new party emerging as a popular contender, the political scene was revitalised — and many who had given up set aside their pessimism to take part in the new developments which will be played out 2012.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 1st, 2012.

Read original post here: The closing of the Pakistani mind

Filed under: Uncategorized

Pakistan: All voices of tolerance silenced in 2011

Earlier this month, another Hindu girl was forcibly converted and her family is fighting the case. However, the father, Narayan Das, alleges that they are being “sidelined in the investigations” and “being threatened to withdraw the case”.

Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch | Int’l Desk
Source/Credit: The News International
By Saher Baloch | December 31, 2011

Karachi: The year 2011 has seen the country lose key political figures to religious extremism and this has set an alarming trend for the years ahead, states the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan in its year-ending report on minorities and the state of human rights in Pakistan.

This year was unlike any other that we have seen, says Zohra Yusuf. The nation witnessed the assassination of a sitting governor, who belonged to the ruling party, and the federal minister for minorities, both in the name of religion.

At the same time, former information minister Sherry Rehman was threatened with her life after she proposed amendments to the blasphemy law. Though the amendments were sensible and proposed to help the vulnerable in the country, Zohra says “it was appalling to see the prime minister withdrawing them and stating on national television that the party had nothing to do with it.” The message that it sent out to the people is one of helplessness, she adds. This inability to admit to the many perils of extremism has led to a number of killings and increased discrimination on many levels.

Ahmedi community

The Ahmedi community, in particular, was the target of religious extremism.

Among the many cases that came to the fore was that of a minor girl, who was accused of blasphemy because of a spelling error. Within a day, there were protest calls in Abbottabad to take action against the girl. Religious leaders used their power to accuse her of blasphemy and the girl, an eighth-grade student, was expelled as a consequence.

Religious hatred is not something that has emerged suddenly, says Akhtar Baloch, a senior member of the HRCP.

“Through the media, we are aware of happenings in every nook and corner in our country, which is both a good and a bad thing. It is good as these issues are being highlighted and bad because they are not addressed beyond condemnation and lip-service by the authorities,” he adds.

The community, according to HRCP’s Perils of Faith report, believes that if the government takes effective measures, the killings would stop. “But the question remains whether the government is even serious in making sure that happens?” asks Zohra Yusuf.

Forced conversions

The forced conversion of Hindu girls in Sindh was a menace that loomed large throughout the year and although many of them migrated, those who stayed have nowhere to go, except the courts.

Earlier this month, another Hindu girl was forcibly converted and her family is fighting the case. However, the father, Narayan Das, alleges that they are being “sidelined in the investigations” and “being threatened to withdraw the case”.

“The courts are helpful in most of the cases, but once you get out of them, there is no security for the victim. There are threats to withdraw cases, which leads to the feeling among minorities that they are not accepted,” says Amarnath Motumal of the HRCP.

The report cites an incident when the HRCP’s staff reported the theft of one of its vehicles in Lahore. Instead of taking notice of the crime, the police were more concerned about finding out why the organisation hired a Christian driver.

Some members felt that communities must stop discriminating against themselves by referring to themselves as minorities. “We are citizens of Pakistan and should not slot ourselves into minorities or majorities,” says Pooja, a resident of Bihar Colony in the HRCP report.

Laws and discrimination

Rolan D’ Souza, a human rights activist, says that the least the government can do is ensure that the law does not discriminate. The clause in the Constitution that says “a non-Muslim cannot be the head of the state” is where the discrimination begins, he says.

At the same time, D’ Souza points out that though the Shia Hazaras in Balochistan are not a part of a minority, they are still being persecuted and 380 have been killed in ten years.

Zohra feels that while the government may not take up these issues the way the organisation wants them to, she urges that “we must not stop raising our voice, because remaining silent in the face of such circumstances would make us a part of them.”

Read original post here: All voices of tolerance silenced in 2011

Filed under: Uncategorized

A Secret War in 120 Countries

From a force of about 37,000 in the early 1990s, Special Operations Command personnel have grown to almost 60,000, about a third of whom are career members of SOCOM; the rest have other military occupational specialties, but periodically cycle through the command.

Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch | US Desk
Source/Credit: TomDispatch | The Huffington Post
By Nick Turse | August 4, 2011

The Pentagon’s New Power Elite
(from TomDispatch.)

Somewhere on this planet an American commando is carrying out a mission.  Now, say that 70 times and you’re done… for the day.  Without the knowledge of the American public, a secret force within the U.S. military is undertaking operations in a majority of the world’s countries.  This new Pentagon power elite is waging a global war whose size and scope has never been revealed, until now.

After a U.S. Navy SEAL put a bullet in Osama bin Laden’s chest and another in his head, one of the most secretive black-ops units in the American military suddenly found its mission in the public spotlight.  It was atypical.  While it’s well known that U.S. Special Operations forces are deployed in the war zones of Afghanistan and Iraq, and it’s increasingly apparent that such units operate in murkier conflict zones like Yemen and Somalia, the full extent of their worldwide war has remained deeply in the shadows.

Last year, Karen DeYoung and Greg Jaffe of the Washington Post reported that U.S. Special Operations forces were deployed in 75 countries, up from 60 at the end of the Bush presidency.  By the end of this year, U.S. Special Operations Command spokesman Colonel Tim Nye told me, that number will likely reach 120.  “We do a lot of traveling — a lot more than Afghanistan or Iraq,” he said recently.  This global presence — in about 60% of the world’s nations and far larger than previously acknowledged — provides striking new evidence of a rising clandestine Pentagon power elite waging a secret war in all corners of the world.

The Rise of the Military’s Secret Military

Born of a failed 1980 raid to rescue American hostages in Iran, in which eight U.S. service members died, U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) was established in 1987.  Having spent the post-Vietnam years distrusted and starved for money by the regular military, special operations forces suddenly had a single home, a stable budget, and a four-star commander as their advocate.  Since then, SOCOM has grown into a combined force of startling proportions.  Made up of units from all the service branches, including the Army’s “Green Berets” and Rangers, Navy SEALs, Air Force Air Commandos, and Marine Corps Special Operations teams, in addition to specialized helicopter crews, boat teams, civil affairs personnel, para-rescuemen, and even battlefield air-traffic controllers and special operations weathermen, SOCOM carries out the United States’ most specialized and secret missions.  These include assassinations, counterterrorist raids, long-range reconnaissance, intelligence analysis, foreign troop training, and weapons of mass destruction counter-proliferation operations.

One of its key components is the Joint Special Operations Command, or JSOC, a clandestine sub-command whose primary mission is tracking and killing suspected terrorists.  Reporting to the president and acting under his authority, JSOC maintains a global hit list that includes American citizens.  It has been operating an extra-legal “kill/capture” campaign that John Nagl, a past counterinsurgency adviser to four-star general and soon-to-be CIA Director David Petraeus, calls “an almost industrial-scale counterterrorism killing machine.”

This assassination program has been carried out by commando units like the Navy SEALs and the Army’s Delta Force as well as via drone strikes as part of covert wars in which the CIA is also involved in countries like Somalia, Pakistan, and Yemen.  In addition, the command operates a network of secret prisons, perhaps as many as 20 black sites in Afghanistan alone, used for interrogating high-value targets.

Growth Industry

From a force of about 37,000 in the early 1990s, Special Operations Command personnel have grown to almost 60,000, about a third of whom are career members of SOCOM; the rest have other military occupational specialties, but periodically cycle through the command.  Growth has been exponential since September 11, 2001, as SOCOM’s baseline budget almost tripled from $2.3 billion to $6.3 billion.  If you add in funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, it has actually more than quadrupled to $9.8 billion in these years.  Not surprisingly, the number of its personnel deployed abroad has also jumped four-fold.  Further increases, and expanded operations, are on the horizon.

Lieutenant General Dennis Hejlik, the former head of the Marine Corps Forces Special Operations Command — the last of the service branches to be incorporated into SOCOM in 2006 — indicated, for instance, that he foresees a doubling of his former unit of 2,600.  “I see them as a force someday of about 5,000, like equivalent to the number of SEALs that we have on the battlefield. Between [5,000] and 6,000,” he said at a June breakfast with defense reporters in Washington.  Long-term plans already call for the force to increase by 1,000.  

During his recent Senate confirmation hearings, Navy Vice Admiral William McRaven, the incoming SOCOM chief and outgoing head of JSOC (which he commanded during the bin Laden raid) endorsed a steady manpower growth rate of 3% to 5% a year, while also making a pitch for even more resources, including additional drones and the construction of new special operations facilities.

A former SEAL who still sometimes accompanies troops into the field, McRaven expressed a belief that, as conventional forces are drawn down in Afghanistan, special ops troops will take on an ever greater role.  Iraq, he added, would benefit if elite U.S. forces continued to conduct missions there past the December 2011 deadline for a total American troop withdrawal.  He also assured the Senate Armed Services Committee that “as a former JSOC commander, I can tell you we were looking very hard at Yemen and at Somalia.”

During a speech at the National Defense Industrial Association’s annual Special Operations and Low-intensity Conflict Symposium earlier this year, Navy Admiral Eric Olson, the outgoing chief of Special Operations Command, pointed to a composite satellite image of the world at night.  Before September 11, 2001, the lit portions of the planet — mostly the industrialized nations of the global north — were considered the key areas. “But the world changed over the last decade,” he said.  ”Our strategic focus has shifted largely to the south… certainly within the special operations community, as we deal with the emerging threats from the places where the lights aren’t.”

To that end, Olson launched “Project Lawrence,” an effort to increase cultural proficiencies — like advanced language training and better knowledge of local history and customs — for overseas operations.  The program is, of course, named after the British officer, Thomas Edward Lawrence (better known as “Lawrence of Arabia”), who teamed up with Arab fighters to wage a guerrilla war in the Middle East during World War I.  Mentioning Afghanistan, Pakistan, Mali, and Indonesia, Olson added that SOCOM now needed “Lawrences of Wherever.”

While Olson made reference to only 51 countries of top concern to SOCOM, Col. Nye told me that on any given day, Special Operations forces are deployed in approximately 70 nations around the world.  All of them, he hastened to add, at the request of the host government.  According to testimony by Olson before the House Armed Services Committee earlier this year, approximately 85% of special operations troops deployed overseas are in 20 countries in the CENTCOM area of operations in the Greater Middle East: Afghanistan, Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, and Yemen.  The others are scattered across the globe from South America to Southeast Asia, some in small numbers, others as larger contingents.

Special Operations Command won’t disclose exactly which countries its forces operate in.  “We’re obviously going to have some places where it’s not advantageous for us to list where we’re at,” says Nye.  “Not all host nations want it known, for whatever reasons they have — it may be internal, it may be regional.”

But it’s no secret (or at least a poorly kept one) that so-called black special operations troops, like the SEALs and Delta Force, are conducting kill/capture missions in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and Yemen, while “white” forces like the Green Berets and Rangers are training indigenous partners as part of a worldwide secret war against al-Qaeda and other militant groups. In the Philippines, for instance, the U.S. spends $50 million a year on a 600-person contingent of Army Special Operations forces, Navy Seals, Air Force special operators, and others that carries out counterterrorist operations with Filipino allies against insurgent groups like Jemaah Islamiyah and Abu Sayyaf.

Last year, as an analysis of SOCOM documents, open-source Pentagon information, and a database of Special Operations missions compiled by investigative journalist Tara McKelvey (for the Medill School of Journalism’s National Security Journalism Initiative) reveals, America’s most elite troops carried out joint-training exercises in Belize, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Germany, Indonesia, Mali, Norway, Panama, and Poland.  So far in 2011, similar training missions have been conducted in the Dominican Republic, Jordan, Romania, Senegal, South Korea, and Thailand, among other nations.  In reality, Nye told me, training actually went on in almost every nation where Special Operations forces are deployed.  “Of the 120 countries we visit by the end of the year, I would say the vast majority are training exercises in one fashion or another.  They would be classified as training exercises.”

The Pentagon’s Power Elite

Once the neglected stepchildren of the military establishment, Special Operations forces have been growing exponentially not just in size and budget, but also in power and influence.  Since 2002, SOCOM has been authorized to create its own Joint Task Forces — like Joint Special Operations Task Force-Philippines — a prerogative normally limited to larger combatant commands like CENTCOM.  This year, without much fanfare, SOCOM also established its own Joint Acquisition Task Force, a cadre of equipment designers and acquisition specialists.

With control over budgeting, training, and equipping its force, powers usually reserved for departments (like the Department of the Army or the Department of the Navy), dedicated dollars in every Defense Department budget, and influential advocates in Congress, SOCOM is by now an exceptionally powerful player at the Pentagon.  With real clout, it can win bureaucratic battles, purchase cutting-edge technology, and pursue fringe research like electronically beaming messages into people’s heads or developing stealth-like cloaking technologies for ground troops.  Since 2001, SOCOM’s prime contracts awarded to small businesses — those that generally produce specialty equipment and weapons — have jumped six-fold.

Headquartered at MacDill Air Force Base in Florida, but operating out of theater commands spread out around the globe, including Hawaii, Germany, and South Korea, and active in the majority of countries on the planet, Special Operations Command is now a force unto itself.  As outgoing SOCOM chief Olson put it earlier this year, SOCOM “is a microcosm of the Department of Defense, with ground, air, and maritime components, a global presence, and authorities and responsibilities that mirror the Military Departments, Military Services, and Defense Agencies.”

Tasked to coordinate all Pentagon planning against global terrorism networks and, as a result, closely connected to other government agencies, foreign militaries, and intelligence services, and armed with a vast inventory of stealthy helicopters, manned fixed-wing aircraft, heavily-armed drones, high-tech guns-a-go-go speedboats, specialized Humvees and Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles, or MRAPs, as well as other state-of-the-art gear (with more on the way), SOCOM represents something new in the military.  Whereas the late scholar of militarism Chalmers Johnson used to refer to the CIA as “the president’s private army,” today JSOC performs that role, acting as the chief executive’s private assassination squad, and its parent, SOCOM, functions as a new Pentagon power-elite, a secret military within the military possessing domestic power and global reach.

In 120 countries across the globe, troops from Special Operations Command carry out their secret war of high-profile assassinations, low-level targeted killings, capture/kidnap operations, kick-down-the-door night raids, joint operations with foreign forces, and training missions with indigenous partners as part of a shadowy conflict unknown to most Americans.  Once “special” for being small, lean, outsider outfits, today they are special for their power, access, influence, and aura.

That aura now benefits from a well-honed public relations campaign which helps them project a superhuman image at home and abroad, even while many of their actual activities remain in the ever-widening shadows.  Typical of the vision they are pushing was this statement from Admiral Olson: “I am convinced that the forces… are the most culturally attuned partners, the most lethal hunter-killers, and most responsive, agile, innovative, and efficiently effective advisors, trainers, problem-solvers, and warriors that any nation has to offer.”

Recently at the Aspen Institute’s Security Forum, Olson offered up similarly gilded comments and some misleading information, too, claiming that U.S. Special Operations forces were operating in just 65 countries and engaged in combat in only two of them.  When asked about drone strikes in Pakistan, he reportedly replied, “Are you talking about unattributed explosions?”

What he did let slip, however, was telling.  He noted, for instance, that black operations like the bin Laden mission, with commandos conducting heliborne night raids, were now exceptionally common.  A dozen or so are conducted every night, he said.  Perhaps most illuminating, however, was an offhand remark about the size of SOCOM.  Right now, he emphasized, U.S. Special Operations forces were approximately as large as Canada’s entire active duty military.  In fact, the force is larger than the active duty militaries of many of the nations where America’s elite troops now operate each year, and it’s only set to grow larger.

Americans have yet to grapple with what it means to have a “special” force this large, this active, and this secret — and they are unlikely to begin to do so until more information is available.  It just won’t be coming from Olson or his troops.  “Our access [to foreign countries] depends on our ability to not talk about it,” he said in response to questions about SOCOM’s secrecy.  When missions are subject to scrutiny like the bin Laden raid, he said, the elite troops object.  The military’s secret military, said Olson, wants “to get back into the shadows and do what they came in to do.”

Nick Turse is a historian, essayist, and investigative journalist. The associate editor of TomDispatch.com and a new senior editor at Alternet.org, his latest book is The Case for Withdrawal from Afghanistan (Verso Books). This article is a collaboration between Alternet.org

Read original post here: A Secret War in 120 Countries

Filed under: Uncategorized

Pakistan maintains top slot in Google search for ‘sex’

The months of February and August (Ramazan) were the only two months in 2011 that did not feature any cities from Pakistan in the global ranking.

Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch | Int’l Desk
Source/Credit: The Express Tribune
By ET Web Desk | December 28, 2011

With over 20 million internet users and growing fast, Pakistan has managed to secure the number one slot for searching the term ‘sex’ globally for all years.

According to a 2010 Fox News report, Pakistan had outranked all countries in Google searches for pornographic terms last year. Narrowing the analytics for the search term to just 2011, Pakistan maintained the number one position, followed by Vietnam and India.

Islamabad featured in the top 10 cities worldwide to search the word ‘sex’ in September and December 2011.

Provincial capital Lahore also featured in the top 10 cities for the months of January, March, April, May, June, July, September, October, November and December 2011.

The months of February and August (Ramazan) were the only two months in 2011 that did not feature any cities from Pakistan in the global ranking.

How does Google Trends work?

Google Trends analyzes a portion of Google web searches to compute how many searches have been done for the terms entered, relative to the total number of searches done on Google over time.

To rank the top regions, cities, or languages, Google Trends first looks at a sample of all Google searches to determine the areas or languages from which they received the most searches for the first term. Then, for those top cities, Google Trends calculates the ratio of searches for the term coming from each city divided by total Google searches coming from the same city.

The city ranking and the bar charts alongside each city name both represent this ratio.

Google Trends uses IP address information from server logs to make a best guess about where queries originated.

Read original post here: Pakistan maintains top slot in Google search for ‘sex’

Filed under: Uncategorized

Pakistan’s chaos theory: A liberal dose of silence

Qadri looked victorious and was praised by lawyers for not fleeing the scene of the incident. It would only be hasty to assume that the pro-Qadri phenomenon was limited to the less-educated and radical sections of Pakistani society.

Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch | Int’l Desk
Source/Credit: DNA India
By Shiv Vikas | December 30, 2011

As several high-profile events unfolded in the country through 2011, Pakistan watchers had an eventful time. While Osama bin Laden’s death in a US operation in Abbottabad made a severe dent in Pakistan’s image of a “credible ally” in the war on terror, growing tensions between the army and the federal government kept its citizens and the international community on tenterhooks. However, amid these high-octane events, the Islamic republic also witnessed a slow but noticeable change in its social fabric.

This year, which has been severely hard for Pakistan’s liberal society, has also seen a simultaneous surge in the number of far-right groups. Moderates, who amid widespread violence have always been a calming influence on many of Pakistan’s right-leaning citizens, have been silenced through either killings or fatwas.

Such oppression has now become an alarming trend across the country. Added to this is the concern that mainstream political parties have been appeasing far-right religious groups with newfound zeal.As a consequence, Pakistan today largely stands divided between the right and far-right, with most moderates finding refuge in silence. Some signs show that the country could follow the same trajectory in 2012 and beyond.

If Pakistan fails to contain it, it will be almost impossible to keep extremist groups like the Tehrik-i-Taliban in check, and that could have disastrous consequences for all.

The question, though, that one is inevitably left with is this — What went so wrong in 2011 that the social balance of Pakistani society is being this irrevocably threatened? To answer this, one would have to take a few steps back in time to comprehend the events over the last 363 days that have spelt doom for the liberals and have, as a result, propped up hard-line groups and their ever abundant sympathisers.

The unfortunate killing of Salman Taseer — while he was serving as the governor of Pakistan’s Punjab province — and the country’s sole minority federal minister Shahbaz Bhatti, shook the very core of Pakistani society. Both leaders were killed because of their liberal views on the country’s controversial blasphemy law. The law seeks to protect Islamic authority and maintains that it is the country’s duty to foster the Islamic way of life, but has in effect been loosely used to target minorities for years. Thousands were charged under this law until November 2010 and convictions were an accepted norm.

The law and its misuse, however, caught worldwide attention when a woman was handed the death penalty by a Punjab court in November last year. Asia Bibi, a practising Christian, was convicted over allegedly making remarks against Islam during an argument with a group of women in Shekhupura district of Punjab.

The conviction sparked a fierce debate in the country and gave religious and hardline groups much-needed fuel that they could use to reach out to masses.

In massive rallies that were held in all major Pakistani cities, there were many who criticised the killings, but who were also protective of the law itself. The unprecedented support given to the law largely silenced the liberals. Former minister Sherry Rehman was the first casualty of this divide in the country. Disturbed by the incident, Rehman decided to move a private member’s bill in the National Assembly to amend the blasphemy law.The move backfired and she was heavily criticised, even by her own party. She was forced to keep a low-profile, fearing for her life after numerous fatwas were issued against her.

Unfazed by Rehman’s fate, Taseer decided to take Bibi’s case to the parliament and to President Asif Ali Zardari. Angered religious groups and sections of the media did not moderate the criticism they heaped on the leader as a result. Taseer did not compromise on his stand and was eventually killed by his own bodyguard Mumtaz Qadri on January 4 this year. Qadri belonged to an Islamic sub-sect called the Barelvi movement and was miffed with Taseer for supporting Asia Bibi in an interview on a television channel.

Taseer’s assassination was a sad event but the events that followed served as an even greater reminder of liberalism’s slow death in Pakistan. Qadri was received outside an anti-terror court to a hero’s welcome. Rose petals were showered on him for “protecting” Islam and many lawyers queued up to fight his case.

Qadri looked victorious and was praised by lawyers for not fleeing the scene of the incident. It would only be hasty to assume that the pro-Qadri phenomenon was limited to the less-educated and radical sections of Pakistani society. Many new-age Internet users created hundreds of pages on Facebook and YouTube. One such page gave him the title of Gazi (a Muslim warrior), much to the amusement of the world outside. Some users of social-networking websites did not stop at that and they continue to create offensive pages against the Taseer family to this day. The family’s only fault was that they held liberal views and found nothing wrong in that.

It is interesting to note that the Pakistan government had banned Facebook over publishing blasphemous content in 2009, but it does not find anything wrong in malicious content being published about the Taseer family. On August 26 this year, a group of unidentified gunmen kidnapped Taseer’s son Shahbaz. He has not been found till date and the media has also put the story on the backburner. One can only wonder if the surname Taseer is now irreversibly jinxed.

Bhatti, another liberal thinker, suffered the same fate as Taseer in February 2011. He was killed by unknown gunmen while going to his office in Islamabad. He was at the forefront of efforts to reform the blasphemy law. Bhatti was a practising Roman Catholic and had assumed the position of an unofficial spokesperson of minorities in the federal government. After these high-profile killings in January and February respectively, religious groups continued making inroads in Pakistani society through the year.

Today one cannot mention many names that openly stand for the rights of minorities in Pakistan. Though in the same breath it must not be denied that liberal thinkers still exist in the Pakistani society. It is just that they would prefer to stay away from controversial subjects like the blasphemy law. With its liberals silenced, Pakistan appears to be a country sliced; certainly an unhealthy status in a world on the brink of catharsis.

The author is a political commentator on South Asian affairs

Read original post here: Pakistan’s chaos theory: A liberal dose of silence

Filed under: Uncategorized

Indonesia: President SBY must learn from Gus Dur on religious conflicts | activist

A compound belonging to the Shiite community in Sampang was allegedly burned down on Thursday by Sunni Muslims, who make up the majority of the Islamic population in Indonesia.

Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch | Int’l Desk
Source/Credit: The Jakarta Post | National
By Bagus BT Saragih | December 30, 2011

In the wake of the brutal arson attack against a Shiite Islamic boarding school in Sampang, Madura, East Java, an activist has called on President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono to learn from his predecessor, the late Abdurrahman “Gus Dur” Wahid, in handling rampant religious conflict in the country.

“After the fatal attack against Ahmadiyah followers in Cikeusik, Banten, in February, such religious conflicts continue. This is a result of the poor and weak leadership of President Yudhoyono, particularly when it comes to maintaining tolerance in this plural nation,” International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ) advocate Usman Hamid said in a statement made available to The Jakarta Post on Friday.

“The President should look at Gus Dur, whose demise will be commemorated on Dec. 31. Gus Dur was always at the forefront of defending minorities,” he added.

A compound belonging to the Shiite community in Sampang was allegedly burned down on Thursday by Sunni Muslims, who make up the majority of the Islamic population in Indonesia.

No casualties were reported.

Several buildings were damaged, including a student dormitory, a mosque, a kitchen, a store and the home of Shiite Islamic boarding school principal Tajul Muluk

Approximately 250 Shiites who lost their homes have been evacuated to the Sampang sports center about 20 kilometers from their neighborhood.

Read original post here: SBY must learn from Gus Dur on religious conflicts: activist

Filed under: Uncategorized

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.